Match statistics snapshot
- Nice created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 2.21, Δ 0.99).
- Lens fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Nice was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.21Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 464Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |