Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 1.09, Δ 0.22).
- Reims fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Reims held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 420 | Total passes | 501Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.