Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (3.20 vs 1.34, Δ 1.86).
- Lens fired more attempts (37 vs 10 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 3.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 24Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 37Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 574Lead | Accurate passes | 204 |
| 642Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 14Lead |
| 3.53 | Goals prevented | 3.53 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Reims |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.