Match statistics snapshot
- Rennes created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 1.42, Δ 0.44).
- Lens fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Rennes was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 403 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 478 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |