Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.26, Δ 0.10).
- Sevilla fired more attempts (10 vs 3 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lens | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lens | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 480Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 568Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lens | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lens | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lens | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.