Match statistics snapshot
- Lille created the clearer chances on xG (3.09 vs 1.87, Δ 1.22).
- Lille fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lille | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 3.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.87 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lille | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 588Lead | Accurate passes | 285 |
| 665Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lille | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lille | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lille | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.