Match statistics snapshot
- Lillestrom created the clearer chances on xG (3.01 vs 1.02, Δ 1.99).
- Lillestrom fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 3.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 219 |
| 623Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |