Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 2.73, Δ 1.34).
- Viking fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.73Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 411Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |