Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 2.38, Δ 1.41).
- Viking fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.38Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 401 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 506 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lillestrom | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |