Match statistics snapshot
- Lincoln created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 1.43, Δ 0.71).
- Lincoln was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 27%).
- Barnsley held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 162 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 248 | Total passes | 569Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |