Match statistics snapshot
- Lincoln created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 0.68, Δ 0.28).
- Lincoln fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Lincoln was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 244Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 383Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.