Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 0%).
- Reading held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 |
| 4Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 166 | Accurate passes | 424Lead |
| 288 | Total passes | 565Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |