Match statistics snapshot
- Lincoln created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.26, Δ 0.78).
- Reading fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Reading held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.26 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 126 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 448Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lincoln | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |