Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 3.94, Δ 3.19).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (79% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Linköping | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.94Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Linköping | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 464Lead | Accurate passes | 372 |
| 546Lead | Total passes | 447 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Linköping | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Linköping | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Linköping | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |