Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 3.63, Δ 3.06).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Rosengård W was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Linköping | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.63Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 14Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Linköping | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 427 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Linköping | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Linköping | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Linköping | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |