Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool Montevideo fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 41%).
- Liverpool Montevideo held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool Montevideo | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool Montevideo | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 295Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 391Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool Montevideo | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool Montevideo | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool Montevideo | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |