Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (2.90 vs 0.58, Δ 2.32).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (28 vs 4 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 472 | Accurate passes | 483Lead |
| 553 | Total passes | 561Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.