Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (3.57 vs 0.84, Δ 2.73).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 3.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 481Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.80 | Goals prevented | 0.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.