Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (3.19 vs 0.45, Δ 2.74).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 3.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 654Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 728Lead | Total passes | 266 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.