Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (2.20 vs 2.03, Δ 0.17).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 639Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 724Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |