Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (2.61 vs 0.92, Δ 1.69).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.61Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |