Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (4.74 vs 0.50, Δ 4.24).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (36 vs 4 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 27Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 14Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 36Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 568Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 621Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 11Lead |
| 3.42 | Goals prevented | 3.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |