Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 1.07, Δ 0.47).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 581Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 660Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.36 | Goals prevented | -0.36 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Liverpool | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |