Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 54% | Pass accuracy | 58%Lead |
| 163 | Accurate passes | 184Lead |
| 301 | Total passes | 317Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.