Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 2.03, Δ 0.71).
- Livingston fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Livingston held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 502Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |