Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock created the clearer chances on xG (0.35 vs 1.94, Δ 1.59).
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 0.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.94Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 454Lead | Accurate passes | 441 |
| 515Lead | Total passes | 484 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| -0.34 | Goals prevented | -0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Livingston | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.