Match statistics snapshot
- Patro Eisden created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 2.50, Δ 1.13).
- Patro Eisden fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Lokeren-Temse was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lokeren-temse | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.50Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lokeren-temse | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 385Lead | Accurate passes | 116 |
| 438Lead | Total passes | 174 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lokeren-temse | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lokeren-temse | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lokeren-temse | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |