Match statistics snapshot
- Dender fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Lommel United was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
- Lommel United held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.