Match statistics snapshot
- Lommel United was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 18%).
- Lommel United held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 11Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 368Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.