Match statistics snapshot
- Lommel United created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 0.33, Δ 1.71).
- Lommel United fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 494Lead | Accurate passes | 293 |
| 567Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.