Match statistics snapshot
- Lommel United fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Lommel United was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
- Lommel United held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 533Lead | Accurate passes | 169 |
| 632Lead | Total passes | 279 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |