Match statistics snapshot
- Lommel United fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Zulte Waregem was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
- Lommel United held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 360 |
| 520Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lommel United | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.