Match statistics snapshot
- Londrina fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
- Ceara held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Londrina | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Londrina | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 254 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Londrina | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Londrina | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Londrina | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |