Match statistics snapshot
- Londrina created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 1.69, Δ 0.01).
- Londrina fired more attempts (24 vs 11 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Londrina | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.69 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Londrina | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 264 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Londrina | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Londrina | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Londrina | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.