Match statistics snapshot
- Londrina created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 0.85, Δ 1.03).
- Londrina fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Novorizontino was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Londrina | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 1.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Londrina | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 363Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Londrina | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Londrina | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.22 | Goals prevented | -0.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Londrina | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.