Key events
View all
Nice- A. Avom
- L. Abergel
- S. Soumano
- S. Soumano
LorientFT 3–1
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Lorient10%
- Draw45%
- Nice45%
Prematch market
No prematch 1X2 odds snapshot available.
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Stade du Moustoir
Lorient · France
- Address
- 11, rue Jean Le Coutaller
- Surface
- artificial turf
- Capacity
- 18970
Match
Romain Lissorgue, France
Round 14
- Referee
- Romain Lissorgue, France
- Round
- Round 14
- Date
Competition
League · France
- Country
- France (FR)
- Season
- 2025
- Dates
- 2025-08-15 → 2026-05-29
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
43%43%57%57%
Expected goals (xG)
2.3874%0.8226%
Total shots
1867%933%
Shots on target
778%222%
Team form & competition
View all- #9Position
- 45Points
- 11-12-11W-D-L
- 48/51Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-0 / 0-4
- Worst defeats
- 1-7 / 4-0
- #16Position
- 32Points
- 8-12-16W-D-L
- 41/61Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-1 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 1-5 / 5-1
Head to head
View all1Lorientwins
3Drawsmatches
3Nicewins
Recorded meetings: 7 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Nice 3–0 Lorient
- Lorient most goals
- Lorient 1–1 Nice
- Nice most goals
- Nice 3–0 Lorient
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Ficonsport-366951-0079-1-6a12b63ed4cd4430714812.jpg)
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F10%2Fyvon-mvogo-6ae277ee808b4914159171.jpg)
Lorient created the clearer chances on xG (2.38 vs 0.82, Δ 1.56). Lorient fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots). Lorient was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 22%). Nice held more of the ball (57% possession).
Lorient outperformed their xG by 0.6 goals (3 scored vs 2.38 xG).