Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.87 vs 0.63, Δ 2.24).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 327Lead | Accurate passes | 303 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |