Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.83 vs 0.67, Δ 2.16).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 388 |
| 545Lead | Total passes | 463 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| -0.12 | Goals prevented | -0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |