Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.18 vs 0.47, Δ 2.71).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 3.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 773Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 843Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.41 | Goals prevented | -0.41 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| Yellow cards |