Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 0.35, Δ 1.09).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 414 | Accurate passes | 534Lead |
| 480 | Total passes | 612Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.18 | Goals prevented | 1.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |