Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.26 vs 0.85, Δ 2.41).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 682Lead |
| 350 | Total passes | 767Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.61 | Goals prevented | -0.61 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |