Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 0.79, Δ 0.48).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Los Angeles FC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 402Lead | Accurate passes | 308 |
| 471Lead | Total passes | 404 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |