Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.39 vs 0.61, Δ 2.78).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 89% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 439 | Accurate passes | 552Lead |
| 492 | Total passes | 611Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.56 | Goals prevented | 0.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Fc | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |