Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles Galaxy created the clearer chances on xG (2.92 vs 0.21, Δ 2.71).
- Los Angeles Galaxy fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- Los Angeles Galaxy was more accurate in front of goal (86% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 648Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 697Lead | Total passes | 398 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| 0.26 | Goals prevented | 0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |