Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 2.36, Δ 0.71).
- Los Angeles Galaxy fired more attempts (23 vs 22 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.36Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 14 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 22 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 388 | Accurate passes | 479Lead |
| 451 | Total passes | 527Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
| 0.23 | Goals prevented | 0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |