Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 1.59, Δ 0.81).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Los Angeles Galaxy was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 311 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 390 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Los Angeles Galaxy | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |