Match statistics snapshot
- Luton created the clearer chances on xG (0.74 vs 0.04, Δ 0.70).
- Luton fired more attempts (6 vs 2 shots).
- Luton was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Luton | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 0.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.04 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Luton | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 56% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 144 |
| 463Lead | Total passes | 256 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Luton | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Luton | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Luton | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |