Match statistics snapshot
- Forest Green fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Luton was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 31%).
- Luton held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Luton | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
3 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
7 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
4 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
5 | Shots on target | 5 |
2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
9 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 16Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Luton | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
275Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
383Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Luton | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Luton | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
0 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 4Lead |
1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Luton | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Luton leads shot accuracy (+78% vs Forest Green)
Luton leads shot accuracy (+78% vs Forest Green)
Forest Green leads (88% vs 78%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Forest Green leads this block
Luton — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Luton — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Forest Green leads this block
Forest Green leads territorial pressure (+105% vs Luton)
Forest Green leads territorial pressure (+105% vs Luton)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Forest Green leads this block
Forest Green had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.
Forest Green leads (12.0 vs 11.0).
Luton leads (38.2 vs 31.0).
Forest Green leads (20.0 vs 9.0).
Forest Green leads (15.0 vs 9.0).