Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 1.98, Δ 1.40).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Luton held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Luton | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.98Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Luton | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 357Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Luton | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Luton | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Luton | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |