Match statistics snapshot
- Reading created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 1.98, Δ 0.15).
- Luton fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 11%).
Luton vs Reading
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Luton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.98Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Luton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 336Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 416Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Luton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Luton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Luton | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |